The correct answer is Edward Said because the term "contrapuntal reading" is specifically associated with his work in postcolonial studies, particularly his seminal book "Culture and Imperialism" (1993).
Explanation:
Contrapuntal reading is a method proposed by Edward Said to analyze texts by considering both the dominant (imperial) narrative and the marginalized (colonized) perspectives. He draws an analogy to music, where "contrapuntal" refers to the combination of different, independent melodic lines. Similarly, Said advocates for reading texts in a way that reveals the interplay between the imperial perspective and the suppressed voices of the colonized.
Why not the others?
Mikhail Bakhtin: Associated with concepts like dialogism, heteroglossia, and the carnivalesque, Bakhtin focused on the multiplicity of voices in literary works but did not coin or use "contrapuntal reading."
Roland Barthes: Known for ideas like the death of the author, mythologies, and semiotics, Barthes was focused on textuality and cultural codes rather than the specific postcolonial critique embodied in contrapuntal reading.
Jacques Derrida: The founder of deconstruction, Derrida analyzed the instability of meaning in texts but did not engage with the postcolonial focus central to Said's contrapuntal reading.
Thus, Edward Said is the critic most closely associated with the term contrapuntal reading, making option 2 the correct answer.